You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Improving healthcare through laboratory medicine
Home
|
Customer Service
|
Site Map
|
Cart
|
Login
About AACC
Members
Events
Government & Public Affairs
Resource Centers
Professional Development
Publications
AACC Store
>
Members
>
NACB - The AACC Academy
>
NACB Blog
Recent Posts
Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID): Should it be performed?
Are reference change values more useful than population-based reference intervals?
Autoimmune diabetes and related conditions
Where Is the Hemoglobin S?
Categories
Cancer and Tumor Markers
Case Study
Clinical Translational Science/Proteomics
CVD/Markers/Risk Factors
Diabetes/Endocrinology
Government Affairs/Patient Safety
Immunology/Infectious Disease
Instrumentation/Technology
Management/Medical Informatics
Molecular Pathology and Genetics
New/Other Disease Markers
Nutrition
POC Testing
Renal/GI/Hepatic
Special Populations
TDM/Toxicology
Archives
Year
: 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
Year
: 2012
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
Year
: 2011
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
RSS Feed
NACB Blog
Is Code 128 an Acceptable Bar Code Standard for Patient Identification in Today’s Health Care System?
2/22/2011 8:08 AM |
Comments (2)
Recommend (1,157)
By
Corinne Fantz, PhD, DABCC, FACB
The use of bar codes for identification purposes has made many health care processes more reliable and efficient. However, while the current laboratory standard is Code 128, it is certainly not the safest and most reliable symbology in use today. Malfunctioning bar code printers, improperly size...(
Read More
)
Posted at 2/22/2011 8:08 AM | Tags:
Government Affairs/Patient Safety
|
Management/Medical Informatics
What Is Pseudohyponatremia?
2/15/2011 10:08 AM |
Comments (5)
Recommend (1,166)
By
Roger Bertholf, PhD, DABCC, FACB
If one were to compile a list of terms that ought to be eliminated from the laboratory medicine lexicon, “pseudohyponatremia” (PHN) would certainly be on it (and, by the way, such a list would be very long!). The problem with the term PHN is that it is used in reference to two completely differen...(
Read More
)
Posted at 2/15/2011 10:08 AM | Tags:
Diabetes/Endocrinology
|
Instrumentation/Technology
Is Use of Inpatient Glycemic Control Protocols Working At Your Institution?
2/8/2011 8:39 AM |
Comments (3)
Recommend (1,325)
By
Stephen Kahn, PhD, DABCC, FACB
It has been roughly 10 years since the first published studies reported that controlling a hospitalized inpatient’s blood glucose level within a narrow range could impact clinical outcomes to potentially have a significant and beneficial effect on the risk of illness or death (1-3). These early...(
Read More
)
Posted at 2/8/2011 8:39 AM | Tags:
Diabetes/Endocrinology
|
Instrumentation/Technology
|
POC Testing
Is A1c Inferior to Plasma Glucose for Detecting Diabetes Risk?
2/1/2011 8:58 AM |
Comments (7)
Recommend (1,285)
By
William E. Winter, MD, FACB
A recent article in Diabetes Care (1) found that hemoglobin A1c did not perform as well for the detection of risk for diabetes as fasting plasma glucose or the 2-h glucose on an OGTT. Do you agree or disagree? Is this the only interpretation of the data? What else might be studied? My comme...(
Read More
)
Posted at 2/1/2011 8:58 AM | Tags:
Diabetes/Endocrinology
|
Management/Medical Informatics
(Hidden) Admin Links
About AACC
|
Members
|
Government & Public Affairs
|
Resource Centers
|
Professional Development
|
Publications
Home
|
Customer Service
|
Site Map
|
AACC Store
|
Login
Contact Us
|
Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer
|
Join AACC
©2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
1850 K Street, NW Suite 625
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (800) 892-1400 | Fax: (202) 887-5093