American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Improving healthcare through laboratory medicine
NACB Blog
By William E. Winter, MD, FACB
PermalinkRecommendFacebookEmailComments

A recent article in Diabetes Care (1) found that hemoglobin A1c did not perform as well for the detection of risk for diabetes as fasting plasma glucose or the 2-h glucose on an OGTT. Do you agree or disagree? Is this the only interpretation of the data? What else might be studied?

 

My comments: The study group was composed of 1625 subjects from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). At follow-up [after an average of 5.2 years (range 4.5– 6.6 years)], fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h glucose following a 75 g glucose challenge (2-h Glu) and hemoglobin A1c were measured. In the absence of diabetes, increased risk for diabetes was defined as a FPG of 100-125 mg/dL (i.e., impaired fasting glucose; IFG), a 2-h Glu of 140-199 mg/dL (impaired glucose tolerance; IGT) or an A1c of 5.7-6.4%. Based upon this definition, IFG was present in 69% of the "at risk subjects", IGT was present in 60% of "at risk" individuals and A1c between 5.7 and 6.4% was present in only 31% of the "at risk" individuals.

 

A concern is that the rates of eventual conversion to full-fledged diabetes were not reported. It is possible that a borderline elevated A1c is more predictive of diabetes that either IFG or IGT. In the natural history of type 2 diabetes, it is known that IGT precedes IFG and a borderline elevation in A1c may be a later event. To this end, the authors reference the literature that an A1c of =>6.5% only recognized one third of people with diabetes. IFG, IGT and a borderline A1c do not describe equivalent stages in the transition from non-diabetic to diabetic. Is this article prematurely critical of A1c for diabetes risk detection?  While A1c is more expensive than a plasma glucose measurement, it is more reproducible and does not require a fasting specimen.

 

Reference

  1. Lorenzo C, Wagenknecht LE, Hanley AJ, Rewers MJ, Karter AJ, Haffner SM. A1C between 5.7 and 6.4% as a marker for identifying pre-diabetes, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Diabetes Care. 2010 Sep;33(9):2104-9.
 The Web application at http://aacc.org could not be found. Verify that you have typed the URL correctly. If the URL should be serving existing content, the system administrator may need to add a new request URL mapping to the intended application. at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite..ctor(SPFarm farm, Uri requestUri, Boolean contextSite, SPUserToken userToken) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite..ctor(String requestUrl) at AACCComment.AACCComment.GetWeb(String WebURL) at AACCComment.AACCComment.GetItemData() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass4.b__2() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at AACCComment.AACCComment.RenderWebPart(HtmlTextWriter output)
About the Author
William E. Winter, MD, FACB
William E. Winter, MD, FACB 
 
Related Links
Special Issue on Diabetes
 
 
Diabetes Certificate Program
Diabetes Certificate Program
 
 
29th Annual Arnold O. Beckman Conference